I've added the optional {} after the empty TimeT cover =) Is it clearer now? I'm... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		nddrylliog on Oct 15, 2009 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Ooc - modern object oriented c I've added the optional {} after the empty TimeT cover =) Is it clearer now? I'm really glad to see that it scratches an itch for many people out there. As always, suggestions are welcome.

bbb on Oct 15, 2009 [–]

Uh, no. I guess I picked the wrong declaration; I meant Tm. There is a bracket/scope opened after 'struct tm' that, as far as I can tell, is never closed.

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact