Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wonder how this would impact an organization like archive.org


There are probably hundreds of reasons why archive.org would be illegal in Europe. It's wonderful that they are based in a country that respects freedom of speech.


That's funny most of HN seems pretty disappointed that it's AT&T's free speech right to hand over your (technically AT&T's) phone records to the gov't (or anyone else they feel like).


AT&T does not have a free speech right to expose information that was not publicly available. Where as, if AT&T was providing information that you had agreed to make available, or was providing information that was already publicly available then they would have, arguably, the right to provide that information again.


archive.org is perfectly happy with censorship, and does this retroactively. Its right there in their FAQ:

  Archive, does respect robots.txt instructions, and even does so retroactively


At the request of the content owner - sure, but what happens when I ask them to take down someone else's content because it mentions my name?


I wonder where you got the inspiration for that concern.





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: