Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Guess what? Women find tit jokes funny too so don't even try and say that you know what the whole group of Women is thinking...

Fuck cencorship. The freedom to offend is more important.



Nowhere did I say that I "know what the whole group of Women is thinking". It's a bit ironic that you precede that with "Women find tit jokes funny" which could be interpreted as you saying that you in fact do know.

But I do know for a fact that some women, in fact some people do not find them funny. Which is what I did say.


So then what's your point?

Don't joke about anything that anybody could possibly get offended at?


That would be ideal, yes. But you could start with avoiding predictable offence to large percentage of people.


Please prove to me that the majority of women or even a large portion are offended. Nobody has done that yet.

Furthermore, even if you could prove that - percentage has nothing to do with it. That is a completely arbitrary qualifier. Offending people is a birth given right. Get over it.


Now you're just trolling. Given the response that occurred in the media and in general, I suggest that you prove the opposite.


> Now you're just trolling.

What the fuck does that even mean?

> Given the response that occurred in the media and in general...

The media is your measuring stick? The same media that regularly objectifies women in your opinion? That's rich. You should probably go think about that some more.

You and all the whiners just like you are the ones complaining about tit jokes, so you prove it.


> The same media that regularly objectifies women in your opinion?

In my opinion? Citation needed.

> You and all the whiners just like you

Sweeping generalisation.

So to be clear, you're saying that there's no fuss being made, and also it's being made by "whiners"?


Does "the media" regularly objectify women or not in your opinion or not?

Why not just tell me the truth instead of asking me to cite you on your own opinion?

(I just can't imagine that you think "the media" is any better than this titstare app. Have you watched TV before?)


Seeing as I never gave any opinion on the question of "Does "the media" regularly objectify women or not", it's irrelevant, despite you erroneously attributing that to me. It's a derailing tactic.


I responded to your assertion that:

> Given the response that occurred in the media and in general...

So no, it's not a derailing tactic. And if you didn't notice, this thread is three pages to the right. There's nothing to derail.

When you're having a conversation in person, do you accuse them of being a Troll and derailing the conversation when they respond to your ridiculous assertions?

Give me a fucking break. This is like arguing with a three year old. OK fine, you can have the last word if it's so important to you. I've already torn apart every single point you think you've made, so fuck off.


If someone repeatedly said things in person like "Give me a fucking break" and "fuck off" and being generally disrespectful, while asserting that "I've already torn apart every single point you think you've made" and regularly misreading what's being said and failing to address the substantial point then yes, I would call them immature.


Respect is earned, not given.


People on HN generally start off with a reasonable amount of respect from me - more so than Reddit or 4chan for instance. I've never seen anyone piss it away so rapidly before though.


Not to mention, there were a lot of arguments he made about not being concerned about being offended, then he got offended and started getting abusive. Ironic.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: