> to write e-mails, draft course descriptions, structure grant applications, revise publications, prepare lectures, create exams and analyse student responses, and even as an interactive tool as part of my teaching.
So your grant applications were written by AI, your lectures were written by AI, your publications were written by AI, and your students exams were marked by AI? Buddy what were YOU doing?
You're assuming the AI was doing all the work as the primary author then? I mean it could be true. But -steelmanning- what if the AI was acting in a supporting role? Like calculators or computers. (people used to assume people were lazy to use those too, I'm sure)
So your grant applications were written by AI, your lectures were written by AI, your publications were written by AI, and your students exams were marked by AI? Buddy what were YOU doing?