Your point is that... Wikpedia editors choice to have articles about sex acts is morally inconsistent with a choice not to have direct links to a site a based around harassing, stalking, doxing, etc that has been directly tied to multiple suicides?

I don't see the connection frankly.

PS. English Wikipedia also does not appear to have an "Anal Creampie" article, let alone one with an animation.

Oh look, an article which isn't titled what you claimed, or about what you claimed, and doesn't include an animation.

Who?

And I still don't see the moral relevance of any of this to choosing not to link to a site that has harassed people into killing themselves.

The picture clearly depicts--and believe it or not I never thought I'd write these words on the Hacker News internet forum sponsored by YCombinator--a vaginal creampie, not an anal one, nor does it seem to be, as you'd previously implied, animated.

How did you found the link?