Yep, but they are still 50x faster than any fpga.

probably not B200 level but better than you might expect:

https://www.positron.ai/

i believe a B200 is ~3x the H200 at llama-3, so that puts the FPGAs at around 60% the speed of B200s?

I wouldn't trust any benchmarks on the vendors site. Microsoft went down this path for years with FPGAs and wrote off the entire effort.

ok? i worked on those devices, those numbers are real. theres a reason why they compare to h200 and not b200

> I have worked with FPGAs that outperform H200s in Llama3-class models a while and a half ago

I'd like to know more. I expect these systems are 8xvh1782. Is that true? What's the theoretical math throughput - my expectation is that it isn't very high per chip. How is performance in the prefill stage when inference is actually math limited?

i was a software guy, sorry, but those token rates are correct and what was flowing through my software.

i believe there was a special deal on super special fpgas. there were dsps involved.