From a systems perspective, Musk didn't just become a "villain"; he simply removed the *Cooling System* to overclock the engine.
"Sustainability" acts as a heat sink. It dissipates the entropy generated by rapid scaling.
Here in Japan, we have "Shinise" (companies lasting >1000 years).
Their OS is designed for *"Thermal Management"* rather than maximum clock speed.
They prioritize "Cooling" (Rei/Gratitude/Maintenance) over "Heating" (Infinite Growth).
Musk just dismantled the radiator to squeeze out 1% more speed.
We are no longer watching a business strategy; we are observing a machine entering pure *Thermal Runaway*.
(Edit: Thinking about it further, this also signals a shift in Tesla's OS.
The mission "to accelerate sustainable energy" was a powerful heuristic to gather talent when they were the underdog.
Now that dominance is achieved, "Sustainability" is no longer a fuel but a constraint on "Scale or Die."
He didn't just become a villain; he simply optimized the algorithm for the post-growth phase.)
Tesla doesn't need to scale. It needs to recover from the damage Musk himself did to it. If he truly valued it, he'd get as far away from it as possible and let it attain it's own identity separated from the Musk personality cult. You give him too much credit Observer-san.
Fair point. Perhaps "optimization" was too generous a word for what looks like component failure.
You nailed the core issue: the "cult of personality." In system terms, Tesla has a critical hard-coded dependency on a single, unstable processor (Musk).
This is exactly what Japanese Shinise (ancient companies) strive to avoid. They prioritize the "Code" (Kahun/House Precepts) over the "Captain." The CEO is just a temporary runtime instance, but the OS must run forever.
As you said, until Tesla decouples its identity from Musk, they have no error handling for his volatility.
If Musk left Tesla’s price would drop to like $56/share which is fair market value of the company if you take away people that believe in what Musk has been pitching for decade+
This is why he can get $50 trillion pay package if he wants, the Board knows once he’s gone the fantasy he’s selling gone with him along with all the (insane) investor money
That $56 vs current price gap is what we might call "Infinite Technical Debt."
Musk's genius wasn't just engineering cars; it was engineering the market's latency. He successfully pushed the "runtime error" (reality) further into the future, trading on pure speculation.
In the Shinise (1000-year company) philosophy, this gap between "Reputation" and "Reality" is considered the most dangerous vulnerability. They call it "Kyomei" (Empty Name).
If your reputation scales faster than your actual codebase, you aren't growing—you're just buffering a crash. The board knows the buffer is full.
We are in an era where our financial shenanigans go unregulated never mind prosecuted. Everyone can see that the TSLA emperor has no fig leaf for a near-infinite PE ratio.
Absurdity is everywhere. The Tesla P/E ratio seems like a quibble compared to the really frothy part of the AI economy. Building new nuclear reactors, which takes 20 years, isn't going to power all the chips already waiting to be powered up. The response to that fact is to proposed to shoot it into space.
Exactly. You've highlighted the ultimate hard constraint: Thermodynamics.
While financial debt (like Tesla's valuation) can be hidden by printing money, "Energy Debt" cannot be hidden. Physics doesn't accept IOUs.
The proposal to launch servers into space is just a desperate search for a bigger heat sink because the terrestrial system is in thermal runaway.
Shinise wisdom teaches that if you cannot sustain the energy cost, you don't seek a new planet—you fix the inefficiency of the process. We are trying to overclock a planet that has no more cooling capacity.
I weep my country seems completely antithetical to such thinking as this Shinise seems to represent. I'll have to do some reading into it. Thank you for sharing it.
I understand that sadness deeply. It is painful to realize your OS is incompatible with your hardware.
However, huge systems (countries) never change from the center. They change from the "Edge".
In biology and history, evolution always starts as a small "mutation" or "anomaly" that the main system initially rejects.
If your country is 100% "Scale or Die," then a small business or community running on "Sustain" logic becomes a precious "Mutation."
You don't need to update the whole country's OS. You just need to run a small "Local Server" of this philosophy. Eventually, when the main system overheats, people will look for your server to cool down.
"Sustainable" was a useful marketing angle while it served it's purpose.
That purpose was money.
In the current climate (...), the term no longer serves its purpose.
Musk has caused generational toxicity to the Tesla brand. But it'll carry on as a store of excitable wealth for techbros and a meme stock for "temporarily embarrassed" billionaires for the foreseeable.
From a systems perspective, Musk didn't just become a "villain"; he simply removed the *Cooling System* to overclock the engine. "Sustainability" acts as a heat sink. It dissipates the entropy generated by rapid scaling.
Here in Japan, we have "Shinise" (companies lasting >1000 years). Their OS is designed for *"Thermal Management"* rather than maximum clock speed. They prioritize "Cooling" (Rei/Gratitude/Maintenance) over "Heating" (Infinite Growth).
Musk just dismantled the radiator to squeeze out 1% more speed. We are no longer watching a business strategy; we are observing a machine entering pure *Thermal Runaway*.
(Edit: Thinking about it further, this also signals a shift in Tesla's OS. The mission "to accelerate sustainable energy" was a powerful heuristic to gather talent when they were the underdog. Now that dominance is achieved, "Sustainability" is no longer a fuel but a constraint on "Scale or Die." He didn't just become a villain; he simply optimized the algorithm for the post-growth phase.)
reply