(this comment)
> This idea sits in a really interesting space because on paper
(previous comments)
> I really like this class of work because it sits at a strange intersection:
> It’s wild how Voyager forces two truths to sit together:
The pattern is "<compliment intellectual stimulation> <make note of juxtaposition>"
> becomes workflow-aware, not just price-aware.
> human mental model instead of the mathematically convenient one.
> run for that mindset more than for the tech.
My meta comment is not breaking the HN guidelines by letter, but may be spiritually breaking guidelines. See:
> Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like.
I think clarification on AI-accusations should be added to the guidelines if it falls under this class of comment.
(this comment)
> This idea sits in a really interesting space because on paper
(previous comments)
> I really like this class of work because it sits at a strange intersection:
> It’s wild how Voyager forces two truths to sit together:
The pattern is "<compliment intellectual stimulation> <make note of juxtaposition>"
> becomes workflow-aware, not just price-aware.
> human mental model instead of the mathematically convenient one.
> run for that mindset more than for the tech.
My meta comment is not breaking the HN guidelines by letter, but may be spiritually breaking guidelines. See:
> Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like.
I think clarification on AI-accusations should be added to the guidelines if it falls under this class of comment.