That's a really post-hoc rationalization for breaking Ubuntu.

steveklabnik · 2025-10-24T15:08:58 1761318538

I'm replying to the general case of why. Obviously breakage is unfortunate. But it's not like there's no benefit.

ok123456 · 2025-10-25T05:16:47 1761369407

Unfortunately, this will leave a stink that will take a lot of bathing and deodorant to mask.

j-krieger · 2025-10-25T07:57:18 1761379038

Thanks steve. Sometimes there is no satisfying people.

j-krieger · 2025-10-25T07:56:40 1761379000

Finding critical bugs is always worth it. This didn't "break" Ubuntu, it was just a hiccup.

ok123456 · 2025-10-25T19:10:07 1761419407

The critical bugs were introduced by replacing working software. And this is just the beginning of finding all the bugs introduced.

It wasn't "worth it" at all.

j-krieger · 2025-10-26T13:12:23 1761484343

I recommend that you look into the bug trackers of the original tools. There were a lot of bug reports that came from reimplementing these tools. It's also not a replacement - at all. You and distro managers can choose not to use them.