I don't think making sarcastic remarks about someone failing to read enough of this header to work out that it's a pretty complete opengl implementation contrary to the implication at the start of the header is really doing much to fight the problem of people not reading articles before commenting.

Your comment makes ne wonder who you think is making sarcastic remarks. I'm not. Probably "Congrats for only reading the header"?

Yes, that is the comment at the top of this chain - which I criticized as a very snarky reply given the specifics of this post.

Yes, sorry to be dense.