Does it matter whether they are actually mentally disturbed, trolls, etc when the LLMs treat it all with the same weight? That sounds like it makes the problem worse to me, not a point that bolsters your view.
Click the "parent" links until you see this exchange:
>> ...Bing felt like it had a mental breakdown...
> LLMs have ingested the social media content of mentally disturbed people...
My point was that formally asserting "LLMs have mental breakdowns because of input from mentally disturbed people" is problematic at best. Has anyone run an experiment, where one LLM was trained on a dataset without such material?
Informally - yes, I agree that all the "junk" input for our LLMs looks very problematic.
