> When imagining a system of government ruled by lawyers, I see it similar to an organization ruled by lawyers. In such organization/government the leaders are afraid of doing and thus are using lawyers as their excuse not to do anything.
My point is you're not describing an organisation ruled by lawyers. You're describing one ruled by nobody.
It would be like me saying organisations led by engineers don't work because if I imagine an organisation where the engineers aren't actually in charge, but someone asks an engineer whenever they don't want to make a decision, it doesn't work.
So, here I don't agree, when no one steps up to take decisions someone will, and in some organization these are lawyers. If the decisions are taken by lawyers, it doesn't matter there's someone that has the title CEO like it doesn't matter that someone has the title King
Others might imagine a parliament system as a system where the lawyers are in control, I don't think that's the case with parliaments
My point is you're not describing an organisation ruled by lawyers. You're describing one ruled by nobody.
It would be like me saying organisations led by engineers don't work because if I imagine an organisation where the engineers aren't actually in charge, but someone asks an engineer whenever they don't want to make a decision, it doesn't work.