No, what you're stating is actually a different but dangerous problem. That is the smart but subservient AI to Dr Evil problem.
The issue talked about here looks similar but is different.
That is the not (or faking) subservient AI with its own motivations. The fact they are 300 IQ means you may very well not understand harm is occurring until it's far too late.
>The problem then isn't really the AI, the robots are morally and ethically neutral.
Again, no. This isn't about AI as a sub-agent. This is about AI becoming an agent itself capable of self learning and long term planning. No human controls them (or they have the false belief they control them).
Both problems are very harmful, but they are different issues.
The issue talked about here looks similar but is different.
That is the not (or faking) subservient AI with its own motivations. The fact they are 300 IQ means you may very well not understand harm is occurring until it's far too late.
>The problem then isn't really the AI, the robots are morally and ethically neutral.
Again, no. This isn't about AI as a sub-agent. This is about AI becoming an agent itself capable of self learning and long term planning. No human controls them (or they have the false belief they control them).
Both problems are very harmful, but they are different issues.