Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's about more than just whether a congressperson is all there or not.

A bigger concern to me is that many of them are old enough that any long-term impacts resulting from bills they pass simply won't happen until they're gone.

And, I would expand that to include more than just Congress - I think major executive offices (e.g., President, VP, cabinet members, etc.) and the Supreme Court should have an age limit for the very same reason. Anyone in government office whose decisions can have long-lasting effects should be young enough they need to keep that in mind.

Anyone who (statistically) has only a few years left to live and especially anyone past the average life expectancy are welcome to hang around in advisory roles, but they should have limited (if any) power to directly affect future policy because they simply don't have any real skin in the game any longer.



Isn't family "skin in the game", in a fairly literal sense?

People don't come from nowhere, they have families, affiliations, communities etc. Politicians in particular are selected for this.


Their families are very well insulated from any negative consequences of their actions.


> Isn't family "skin in the game", in a fairly literal sense?

It is as long as the person really cares about their family. You sure they all do?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: