Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I mean sure, but it is based on an actual MIT study. Which they are clearly trying to spin in their favor, but real data nonetheless.


> based on an actual MIT study

Speaking of which, anyone have a link to the study itself? Since the linked marketing post doesn't even provide a link to it, just a bunch of links to their own platform and social media accounts.

Probably better for the submission to link directly to the study, without the extra call-to-action fluff at the end?


It was mentioned and discussed in a fair amount of other articles and blog posts on HN as well. So it was fairly easy to find: https://mlq.ai/media/quarterly_decks/v0.1_State_of_AI_in_Bus...


i found this analysis interesting - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QzqyrnL010


specifically, a study done by the NANDA group at MIT

https://nanda.media.mit.edu/

they seem to be pushing their own take on how to implement agentic AI

frankly this study and the headlines surrounding it all seem like a bunch of marketing spin




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: