It also can't seem to create icons from another set and match the stroke weight, curvature, and other stylistic choices of another simple icon set. Seems it struggles with tight constraints. 10 years ago you would think it would be able to handle the visually "simple" things over the more complex ones it can do today. Sorry, my disappointment is showing isn't it?

Of course the fundamental failure case is solving novel problems.

If it's in a book AI can do it.

Asking if it's in the book, maybe not.

Not in the book, definitely not.

McSweeney's is a humor site and this article is not meant seriously.

Sometimes the jester is the only one allowed to tell the truth.

Weirdly you're replying to the OP, who you'd think would ha' clocked tha

Nah I'm talking to the "if it's in the book" poster.

That person is also the submitter

Well well well. My reading comprehension fail.

refreshing