Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is the same guy who worked at OpenAI because he "loved" what he does and he wasn't doing it for money. ( Until this year obviously ;) )


What are you referring to with "until this year"? There was a report last year that Sam Altman would receive equity in the new for-profit, but he denied this, and the recent restructuring post makes no mention of it.


P.S. Not blaming him for this behavior, probably I would also change my mind immediately if someone offered me 7% of $300B


He already had enough wealth that he was in a threshold where it wouldn't matter if he got a few more billion if that the was the lifestyle he was willing to lead. There isn't a magical kind of sugar, or drug that's available to a multi-billionaire but not someone with 100s of millions.

If somebody is trying to get billions, they're doing it because they're the type of person that wants to be a part of politicis, and a power player. That kind of person was never going to just give up the opportunity to make more money and gather more power to do more things that they see as neccessary and as good.


Do you really think everyone out there is willing to be a sell out?


Nothing wrong being a sell out - except when you claim to not be one.


I clearly said: "probably I would", I didn't generalize it to everyone


Absolutely. Everyone has a price.


Speak for yourself. I don't agree with your idea on prostitution.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: