The implication here is that illegal immigration is somehow morally and/or legally justified if legal immigration is too hard. Or that a country is morally obliged to accept immigration of a level specified by a random person on the Web.
Neither of which I find any inclination to agree with.
The article states almost hilariously: "By design, it excludes the vast majority of potential immigrants."
Yes. That's the point. It's by design. By design, the US does not want to accept lots of random immigrants. You don't need to explain how it's difficult by design; it was designed for that purpose.
The article states almost hilariously: "By design, it excludes the vast majority of potential immigrants."
Yes. That's the point. It's by design. By design, the US does not want to accept lots of random immigrants. You don't need to explain how it's difficult by design; it was designed for that purpose.