Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You know that if US East suffers a FULL data loss that the recovery would take weeks with the question if it would even be possible. That's what happened to ovh... it wasn't just one building.


> It's not like there is a mirror datacenter just two blocks away

Isn't that exactly what Availability Zones are for? They're physically separate[0] datacenters and each one contains a copy of each S3 object (unless using the explicit single-zone options)

It's also straightforward (although not necessarily that cheap) to replicate S3 objects to another region

[0] https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/faqs/?nc1=h_ls#Platform


If us-east-1 ever suffered a “FULL” data loss, it would be a company-ending event for so many companies that it would practically end society as we know it.

OVH’s failure was a single building. That’s the problem with a lot of server hosters - even Google has their availability zones all co-located in the same building, so a physical event like a fire could take down an entire region. AWS has AZs in physically separate locations, each with 1+ separate DCs.


Is the any GCP documentation on that? Sounds like a far bigger risk going with GCP than AWS if all zones in a region are in the same building.


It literally was one building in france, that burned to the ground: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/analysis/ovhcloud-fire...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: