While I see what you tried to mean, that doesn't justify what was quoted above. At the very least, it alone can't determine whether it's a disorder and/or sexual orientation or not.
Fair enough, I agree that the word disorder or orientation is not supported by my evidence*. But it does support that, for non-contact minor attraction at least, it should be morally and legally accepted (this was what I was trying to reply to). It is actually a marginalised group. The MAPs (minor attracted people) most vulnerable and prone to suicide are actually children themselves, as supported by the evidence.
*For non-contact minor attraction, I believe it is not a disorder because it does not affect functioning in society (it doesn't harm others), nor does it impact functioning in occupational contexts. But you're correct that this was a separate point and shouldn't have been conflated.
