Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The difference is more than semantics, but there will always be vendor innovation to blur boundaries.


No it is not. I self-host on my hardware and regularly consider moving some services to a VM hosted by someone else. It would still be self-hosting because I am in control of the service.

If you want to have a truly service "by you" this is going to be complicated to rewrite (or review) the applications and OS and build your own hardware from something arbitrarily defined as "scratch".

It sounds very much like the discussions of audiophiles about golden cables and what not - while others listen to the music for the pleasure of listening.


> VM hosted by someone else ... would still be self-hosting because I am in control of the service.

A hosting vendor will have detailed "Terms of Service" by jurisdiction, self-hosting will not.

> complicated to rewrite (or review) the applications ... build your own hardware from scratch

There are options between those two extreme scenarios, many discussed at length in HN self-hosting threads.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: