It looks very selectively at one successful category of enterprises and then generalizes this onto all.
But:
What about all those founder mode companies that went terribly wrong?
What about all the companies that function well in “non-founder” mode? Apple today is a perfect example.
I don’t think it’s about founder/non-founder either but about some underlying fundamental principles that PG hasn’t figured out yet.
It looks very selectively at one successful category of enterprises and then generalizes this onto all.
But:
What about all those founder mode companies that went terribly wrong?
What about all the companies that function well in “non-founder” mode? Apple today is a perfect example.
I don’t think it’s about founder/non-founder either but about some underlying fundamental principles that PG hasn’t figured out yet.