Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Those focusing on QA, staged rollouts, permission management etc are misguided. Yes of course a serious company should do it but CrowdStrike is a compliance checkbox ticker.

They exist solely to tick the box. That’s it. Nobody who pushes for them gives a shit about security or anything that isn’t “our clients / regulators are asking for this box to be ticked”. The box is the problem. Especially when it’s affecting safety critical and national security systems. The box should not be tickable by such awful, high risk software. The fact that it is reflects poorly on the cybersecurity industry (no news to those on this forum of course, but news to the rest of the world).

I hope the company gets buried into the ground because of it. It’s time regulators take a long hard look at the dangers of these pretend turnkey solutions to compliance and we seriously evaluate whether they follow through on the intent of the specs. (Spoiler: they don’t)



In a slightly less threatening but equally noxious box-checking racket, a company I work with is being sued for their website not being sufficiently ADA-compliant. But the first they heard of the lawsuit, before they were even served, was an email from a vendor who specializes in adding junk code to your website that's supposed to tick this box. The vendor happens to work closely with several of the law firms who file and defend these suits.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: