I was wondering whether you had ever considered developing an alias email service instead of temporary email? Many users who use temporary email services may soon be blacklisted. Personally, I believe that an open-source service such as Addy (previously AnonAddy) has a brighter future. I am not a technological specialist, therefore I can just mention on the user side.
Regardless, I appreciate your efforts to help the community. I wish you good health and success.
If I'm not misunderstanding you, the same should go for aliases as they will be flagged as disposable addresses as well. I also noticed that Addy allows users to send emails through it, which is a risky process as it requires close monitoring so spam isn't sent out through the service.
I will take a closer look at this and see if it's possible to improve it in some way.
Thanks for the kind words also and the same to you! =)
Simple Login (SL), Addy (AD), and DuckDuckGo Email Protection (DDG) are the 3 alias email services I use. Both SL and AD can send and receive. DDG only receives. You can disable the sending direction and simply allow the forward service to run. I believe you will be able to handle this technological challenge. SL and AD are free for 10 aliases, but AD also includes PGP in the free tier. DDG allows for unlimited aliases but does not support PGP; nonetheless, it is free.
How great would it be if you could combine the benefits of such services?
I quote a section that corresponds to my situation
>Email is everyone’s primary trust anchor online
>If a user loses access to an online account, most services have an account recovery mechanism that will let the user back in. Usually, this works by sending an email to the user with a one-time password.
>If an attacker compromises a user’s email account, they can use the same mechanism to gain control of the user’s account on any service that uses the email account as a trust root. In practice, that’s most of the user’s online accounts. Unfortunately, two-factor authentication only offers limited protection. It is opt-in and usually uses a phone number, which is easily hijacked.
>If account recovery emails were encrypted, the trust anchor would instead be the encryption key. Since the encryption key is stored on the user’s computer, this would defeat this type of attack.
Got it, that makes more sense and could actually make your inbox more private as the email provider won't be able to snoop into your emails to gather data to "make your ads more personalized".
I'll look into this now that it makes more sense, thanks for the advice!
Regardless, I appreciate your efforts to help the community. I wish you good health and success.