Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Image hosting is not a viable business.

Source: every image host that has ever existed (note the past tense)



Charge for storage and bandwidth. Providers like AWS S3 are doing fine with that model.

E: not bandwidth, data transfer


And this is exactly why S3 is meant for developers. The average person does not want to think about limits they cannot control, like a burst in viewership for an image they uploaded.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: