>- Nuvia’s derived IP is not transferable without ARM agreement
Binds Nuvia and Nuvia's license, not Qualcomm.
An analogy I can think of is how sometimes luxury brands give gifts or discounts to celebrities for marketing purposes with contract that forbid resales. (eg [0])
In this case the brand can only sue entities it had a specific contract with.
Back to the case at hand I believe that unless Qualcomm license includes a term along the lines of "You cannot buy Arm's IP unless Arm pre-approves it"[1] to hold Qualcomm culpable of this transfer.
To my understanding Arm used this proibition mainly to terminate Nuvia's license
>- Nuvia’s derived IP is not transferable without ARM agreement
Binds Nuvia and Nuvia's license, not Qualcomm.
An analogy I can think of is how sometimes luxury brands give gifts or discounts to celebrities for marketing purposes with contract that forbid resales. (eg [0])
In this case the brand can only sue entities it had a specific contract with.
Back to the case at hand I believe that unless Qualcomm license includes a term along the lines of "You cannot buy Arm's IP unless Arm pre-approves it"[1] to hold Qualcomm culpable of this transfer.
To my understanding Arm used this proibition mainly to terminate Nuvia's license
[0] https://duckduckgo.com/?q=john+cena+sells+car+lawsuit+ford&t...
[1] AFAIK this line might be in their license. I obviously do not have specific knowledge.