Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes, the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction is agreed to be 66 mya with some surprisingly tight error bars of about 50k years.

But for the purpose of discussion 100 mya is close enough in terms of orders of magnitude so there's not a need to be pedantic.



I disagree. When one is only concernde about the order of magnitude, it should be given as 1*10^2 mya or as 0.1 bya. What the OP said is analogous to saying that one's grandfather died at the age of 100, when in reality he only lived to be 66.


I don't know if it will make you feel better or worse, but when writing the comment I looked up wikipedia, saw "66", thought "eh" and wrote 100.

If my grandfather had made it to 66 million I would have done the same thing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: