I don't understand your comment. Oracle is hypocritical because like every company they take everything they can and give the minimum they have to? which part is hypocritical?
I'm incredulous that you don't understand, but I'll humour you.
Let's see;
If I giving away a product because I think it's for the betterment of mankind, and definitely not an attempt to rug-pull or anything like that: no, just for developer good will.
Then I am offered a free service, and I do not use it for fear that there could potentially be some rugpulling, despite having a reputation for that myself: and the project I'm considering having no reputation for that.
Then the pretense in which I "give away" my software, is morally dubious. I would never permit myself to be in the same situation as I need others to be in order for my product to be successful.
This still doesn't make any sense to me. In order to use free software you need to make all your software free, is it that?
I have no sympathy for oracle or their products but I fail to see the hypocrisy here. I think oracle is pretty consistent in their position over the years.
What are you talking about? this is a COMPANY NOT A PERSON. Who is "I" in your example? The point of Oracle is to maximize it's profits, it appears to be doing that via whatever means are available. This is not hypocrisy or anything like it