Under regular circumstances criticism is valuable, but it’s very difficult to tell what is valid vs what is concocted via the media hype cycles.
2 years ago it was “rocket man: bad”, now it’s “electric car man: bad”.
The ‘missteps’ pointed out by these who ‘know better’ are about the equivalent of someone who can beat three of their friends in chess deeming magnus carlsen a fool for playing moves they don’t have the faintest idea how to analyse or comprehend.
> it’s very difficult to tell what is valid vs what is concocted
The blog post contains many many links to sources.
> someone who can beat three of their friends in chess deeming magnus carlsen a fool for playing moves they don’t have the faintest idea how to analyse or comprehend.
If Magnus Carlsen runs around lying and killing people, I don't need to play 4-D chess better than him to judge him.
Given the seemingly bizarre moves of late, I think it's interesting to get more context.