Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, it's not Habeck that did it. it's the German chancellor that had to step in and enforce it...

And how is telling the truth a bad faith attack?



What truth exactly? As far as I can remember Haback was willing to extend the run time of two reactors and the chancellor then decided for all three for the interest of piece.


Refresh your memory. The German chancellor had to enforce the extension.

And the real bad-faith attack here is to make it look like there weren't any new circumstances that made it necessary to reconsider the runtime of the plants.

Seeing how three public servants modified a document to change its meaning from 'possible' to 'not possible' so that it looks to Habeck like there is no other option available is highly alarming.

When you alter a document to reflect your ideological views instead of going with its content and by this going against the public/greater good of the German people with intent to present false information to Habeck then this could be considered nothing short of treason.


Please spell it out: What exactly was changed from "possible" to "not possible"? By looking at the document, this does not hold up. Sorry.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: