Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Unreal:

> Allred tweeted that the school achieved a 100 percent job-placement rate in one of its cohorts, and later acknowledged in a private message that the sample size was just one student.



When confronted about this on Hacker News, Austen defended himself with:

> I did say the hiring rate of a cohort of one student was 100%. And in the same tweet I said, in all caps BUT VERY SMALL SAMPLE SIZE. Odd how that doesn’t make the article, don’t you think?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26813371

Incidentally, it did make it into the article he's referring to, twice.


I've been in a lot of from arguments but never had one where I was later proven right by the federal government. That's quite the feather in your cap.


Incidentally, comments like the one you made back in 2021 are part of what make HN so great, thanks.


I could almost respect the hilarity of this defense if it weren't about him having scammed people for (in aggregates) millions


Aha that’s a gem, it’s like that crypto company listed “audited by <some famous reliable auditor >”. They do not mention they failed the audit, but they “did” get audited.


Or Tether. "We realize - but hope you don't - that 'financial attestations' do not remotely resemble 'audits', but we're going to call this financial attestation an audit". And "If you don't fall for the first, we're going to tell you that we have had audits done but we won't release them because they're in Mandarin Chinese."

I wish I was kidding.


From what I’ve read about his career before this he was basically a growth marketer/hacker

Like the only thing he knows how to do is fudge things with dark patterns to achieve growth at any cost


Technically, the statement is still valid. It's just that the confidence interval will be wide. :-)


He seems to be the king of technically.

"For a few months in 2013, Allred camped out of his car while in Silicon Valley, and frequently describes this period as having been homeless. However, a deleted post on his blog titled 'Voluntarily Homeless in Silicon Valley' explains that he lived out of a car by choice."


I have a friend who is adamant that he lives out of his truck by choice, but it's hard to call it a choice when there's only one option. I wouldn't hold his feet to the fire if he later admitted he was in a rough spot (our friend group is all very clear on this situation). I had put Allred entirely out of my mind for a while, but I seem to recall his "homelessness" was characterized more by image than by practicality. Since we're being technical, it seems worth making the distinction.


I had this same debate here a few months ago, about people living out of their truck/van in Seattle, and the "choice" of it. There was more than one person that could (or would) not see the distinction. "I've seen plenty of social media and YT videos talking about how much they enjoy the experience".

Uhh, when people talk of living out of a vehicle in the context of homelessness, they're talking about people parked in the back corner of a Walmart lot with their laundry and many earthly possessions beside them, not social media creators making YouTube videos for "#vanlife".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: