Yes, but decreased range only matters on long trips (like the one I describe), and the only thing it does it make you have to charge more frequently. I described how much that would actually matter on a real trip.
As for your second sentence, the entire point of this article was that that's not true.
> As for your second sentence, the entire point of this article was that that's not true.
1. It was not my claim, I was just clarifying OP's claim.
2. "That's not true" is an oversimplification. The article is basically saying that the software vehicles have to prevent damage from fast charging generally seems to work and minimal damage is occurred. But it still cautions against fast charging in high temperatures for example
As for your second sentence, the entire point of this article was that that's not true.