Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> it is not cheap

New nuclear isn’t cheap. Existing nuclear is cheap enough. The fact remains that the answer to OP’s question is Germany shuttered its plants and began importing dirty power.



I believe the question should be, “what is the cost of the emissions delta of early turndown of these plants vs continuing to run them until retirement (whether due to economics or longevity),” in both fiat and emissions. It is not as simple as “we should’ve run them until the doors fall off.” That is a simple idea for a complex problem.


> It is not as simple as “we should’ve run them until the doors fall off.” That is a simple idea...

It is also a straw man. The Neckarwestheim reactor, which Germany shut down this year, began operating in 1989 [1]. The average age of America's reactors is almost a fifth longer, with decades life left [2].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_Germany#React...

[2] https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/whats-lifespan-nuclear-re...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: