This (or something derived from it) would be used for power delivery literally everywhere in the world. It might well be bigger in scale and volume than all the computers.
You're right. But, we should also do things that matter. This wouldn't. Right now, our horizon is literally 5 years. Anything that doesn't help in the next 5 years needs to get in line, because we've got 50 years of inaction to make up for.
OTOH, I am also not sure what we as a species can do in the next 5 years that actually will matter.
Probably both? At least the first. For integrated circuits, I think lead is a hard pass (for now), and the deposition process needs to be worked out.
Ideally, this could be useful for the hottest paths: clock tree, high-speed buses, as well as the power supplies.
There are a few hurdles though: high-speed voltage changes create changing currents, which creates variable magnetic fields, which IIRC may be a problem depending on the superconductor's characteristics. Processors also work at low voltages, which means that they need huge currents. Both magnetic fields and large current (as well as high temperatures) can break down superconductivity. So it's challenging, but probably doable.
I think it would still change the world less than computers have changed it. Without computers we wouldn't have this conversation. So much in the modern world is basically impossible without computers.
Superconductivity will for sure enable some innovations and could change how we are building power grids, but I don't see it changing the world to the same extent.
I think it's comparing incomparable technologies. Like the wheel and the alphabet; both changed human history in profound ways, without competing with one another.
Dunno. A fancy tape or such made out of lead compounds would be a hard sell in comparison to ordinary copper for household wiring.
But yes, for serious uses, this will be a big deal if it works out and can be made into a flexible cable. And I’m sure people will work on a less-toxic version.
Long distance electrical transmission will still require huge capital investments and lots of maintenance even if transmission losses are eliminated. And as a practical matter, strategic political concerns will take precedence. In the current political climate it's hard to imagine connecting our grid to potentially hostile nation states which might cut off power supplies to apply pressure during a crisis.
If we can't handle / get motivation for long-line HVDC transmission I guarantee you we aren't going to be able to put together the will to make an entire transmission system out of a novel material with unknown mechanical constraints. Long distance transmission is not a solved problem, but it's close. We have the technological capability now to make much, much better transmission systems. We just don't want to.
While that would be nice, it's not exactly revolutionary. We can already build cables to transmit power over vast distances and can certainly imagine a world where we do the same, but with higher efficiency. The computer transformed how we live our lives and reshaped our culture, to the point where what we are doing right now - casually chatting with anonymous people spread around the globe about a scientific paper that we can all read at our leisure immediately upon publication - was inconceivable within living memory.