Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why? Did something have to be said when Google launched Google+? Or any of the other social platforms?


My memory is hazy of those years, but I do think it was a bit different.

IIRC, G+ was a defensive maneuver. G was terrified of FB, who was executing successfully on many fronts and putting pressure on advertising revenues. And so G tried to make G+ happen.

By contrast, in this case, Twitter keeps shooting itself in the foot. (I guess that's what happens when you lay off huge swaths of the company and demand that engineers print out their code on paper.) So Threads (and others) are moving into the vacuum that's been created.

So things right now feel like much more of a competitive land-grab, and it's not entirely clear who's going to win (or even why/how they'll win, or even what the victory conditions look like).


Yes that was definitely an era of its own when there was lots of stiff competition for social networks.


Pretty sure Threads has more users in less than a week than G+ ever had...


I wouldn't trust uncorroborated numbers that aren't even talking about daily active users.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: