Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Right, but the person I responded to spoke as if this was going to be a way to increase consumer choice. It's not.

Everyone will not get "the privacy/control tradeoff they want". They're going to get whatever the creator of the app decides. And sure, for TODO apps, you can choose from the 15 billion ones out there. But if you want ride-sharing, you have Lyft and Uber. If you want specific services, you will have to use their app.

And after the shit Epic pulled, I don't really think I want them in control of the payment processing portion.



I would rather pay less for Ubers than have Apple’s protections. I would rather pay less for Uber and have Apple’s protections.

Apple will still offer Uber, but they will take a smaller cut. Uber will still be available on the App Store because it is the most common App Store.


Apple doesn't offer Uber. Uber offers Uber. Uber offers it through the App Store because that's their only option. And even if the only thing that happens is that Apple takes a smaller percentage, that doesn't impact me at all. I'd still pay the same.

So, in your best case, we have a scenario that is neutral for me. Excuse me for not being thrilled by that.


It impacts you in the form of lower prices.


Uber is going to collect the difference, not the customer.


Seems unlikely. Uber is facing significant price pressure.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: