Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The comment is a bit abrupt.

The article questions the normal distribution assumption for benchmark timings.

It says that this assumption would be important for the "standard error of the mean":

"Your error should go down as the square root of the number of measures."

Standard distribution is not even necessary for this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_error

However, normal distributions actually behave benignly and are a prerequisite for some statistical tests.

This is where my first comment gets in, that for my benchmarking statistical tests are not necessary at all ...

---

The author writes that he only measures minimum and average, but the maximum values are of course also important and worth to measure.

The author's key point is that without a normal distribution, the maximum values can be highly scattered. I agree and basically it is always nice to know the distribution of the random variable.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: