Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Good point. Even if there's a more widespread problem in society, it's pretty unpleasant for some victims to be thought of as a distraction.


The victim isn't the distraction. It's the disproportionate coverage.

Eg: "cyclist kills pedestrian" The town hall and citizenry get up in arms to protect pedestrians, letters to the editors are flying about the menace of push bikes, links are shared and retweeted thousands of times. Laws are passed to enforce bicycle registration, speed limits on trails are imposed and metered, enforcement task forces are created, and proud press releases from the mayor to address the citizens concerns for "getting tough on bikes - we will protect the pedestrians!"

Meanwhile, a pedestrian is struck and killed by a motor vehicle every 85 minutes in the USA. A pedestrian being struck and killed by a bicycle is just rare. While the families of either victim grieve just as much as the other, the measures to protect the pedestrians are virtue signaling and overall a way to avoid dealing with the real problem (like, actually making people drive under 35mph so crashes are survivable for pedestrians, etc..)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: