Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not quite as damaging, but I was accused of harassment from some blue-haired weirdo on a video call with nearly a hundred people at work. Like you, this was a person I had zero interaction with prior to the call.

I considered getting a lawyer involved because I feared this could blow up, but was talked out of it by my boss, who asked me to apologize and "let's leave it at that".



So you apologized to someone you had no interactions with for harassing them, even though the claim was false?


No, I didn't communicate with them ever again - but my boss wanted me to apologize to "help clear the air". My boss was worried about their position, and went with the best option to help their own career if things blew up.


That's so depressing. I avoid blue hairs like the plague, to hear they will go after you anyway, yet another reason not to participate at work.


Didn't the 100 people on the call see that it wasn't harassment? What could possibly have happened to make the weirdo think you were harassing him?


> Didn't the 100 people on the call see that it wasn't harassment? What could possibly have happened to make the weirdo think you were harassing him?

Some might have, but deciding to jump in to defend the accused would result in a decent chance of the defender getting targeted themselves, in some fashion.


Simple - kudos from a VP on a project my team had been working on.


[flagged]


Not really. It added important context.


[flagged]


I hope someone will make a study about a possible correlation of hair styles and borderline personality disorder. Coincidentally, the only girl who ever sexually harassed me also had blue hair and BPD.

Happened in a psych ward, so escalating that issue was fortunately very easy and handled professionally.


> The context it added was evidence of bias and increased likelihood the allegations are true.

The context it added was the accuser's social presentation and personality.

And frankly, the act of making a false accusation is both weird and malicious, in and of itself.


Someone with blue hair is more likely to seek attention.


But calling them out as a "weirdo" is not a good look, to be honest. Such a statement carries context as well.


Sounds to me like someone has had a lot of different hair colors.

Anecdotes aren't data but when it comes to weird people, and non-natural hair colors, I've seen a lot of overlap. Practically 1-to-1, save for a few of the e-girl, OF demographic doing it to make money via cosplay and the like.


I've never dyed my hair but I do think it's noteworthy when someone is using biased language when reporting their side of a story. Calling anyone a "weirdo" is a good signal for how you might treat someone.


Indeed.

> Blue Hair and the Blues: Dying Your Hair Unnatural Colours is Associated with Depression

> A number of lines of evidence, such as studies of religious converts and members of conspicuous subcultures, have found a relationship between holding and expressing a strong counter-cultural identity and mental instability. Here we test whether dying your hair an unnatural colour - something which conspicuously expresses non-conformity - is related to mental instability, using a large dataset of online daters (OKCupid dataset, about n=14k used in this study). We find the expected pattern, which was moderate in size (p = -033 to -0.23, depending on controls). This pattern persisted even when controls for age, race, sex, sexual orientation, body type, intelligence, polyamory, vegetarianism, and political beliefs were included.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361085409_Blue_Hair...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: