Why do you even bother to comment when you you don't bother to actually read what I wrote? That alone would have been sufficient, but I also posted this link specifically: https://www.edx.org/course/quantum-mechanics-for-everyone
> ...the basic ideas of quantum mechanics with a method that requires no complicated math beyond taking square roots
A 6 week online course, taken at your leisure.
Please do read comments before you reply, next time. I don't need another reddit.
It's not about putting in years of effort for a Master in Physics - it's about using the effort already invested, but instead of always not-learning, just START taking even the most basic course. I linked one, and such are very easy to find.
Sorry, but such an arrogant reply makes me a bit mad. I provided good links and you ignored everything - thereby helping to support exactly my point. People are lazy, even with good resources available at their fingertips, or even in front of them, not reading what the author wrote but what their own brain after lots of processing and filtering very freely interprets into it.
> the basic ideas of quantum mechanics with a method that requires no complicated math beyond taking square roots
False^
From the faq:
> Q: What level of math is needed for this class?
> A: High school algebra and trigonometry.
the average person does not have this level of mathematics mastered
I’m sure the content is good, but I have no way to evaluate that without actually going through the course. I still highly doubt it’s claim that you’ll learn qm “better than Einstein” from it.
> ...the basic ideas of quantum mechanics with a method that requires no complicated math beyond taking square roots
A 6 week online course, taken at your leisure.
Please do read comments before you reply, next time. I don't need another reddit.
It's not about putting in years of effort for a Master in Physics - it's about using the effort already invested, but instead of always not-learning, just START taking even the most basic course. I linked one, and such are very easy to find.
Sorry, but such an arrogant reply makes me a bit mad. I provided good links and you ignored everything - thereby helping to support exactly my point. People are lazy, even with good resources available at their fingertips, or even in front of them, not reading what the author wrote but what their own brain after lots of processing and filtering very freely interprets into it.