This is cool. This technique should work nicely quite often. Although, it will also generate many false-positives alerts.
At Codium.ai, we are trying to tackle this problem. We are developing a new code integrity product that intends to do something quite similar. Codium will mark problematic parts of the code (a.k.a bugs), via auto-generated tests, that isn't inline with the developer's intent. The tricky part is to have high accuracy. We don't want to annoy any folks with false positives.
We would love to get your feedback about what we are working on!
We are developers with ML background, excited about exploiting ML for software development, so developers can code fast with confidence.
At Codium.ai, we are trying to tackle this problem. We are developing a new code integrity product that intends to do something quite similar. Codium will mark problematic parts of the code (a.k.a bugs), via auto-generated tests, that isn't inline with the developer's intent. The tricky part is to have high accuracy. We don't want to annoy any folks with false positives.
We would love to get your feedback about what we are working on! We are developers with ML background, excited about exploiting ML for software development, so developers can code fast with confidence.