>Things algorithmically generated from a copyrighted work constitute derived work.
This is a very strong statement that is not, at least to me, obviously true. I am curious what your argument is - learning from a copyrighted work does not automatically make a work derivative.
These models do not store copies of images they learned from, or attempt to replicate these images. They learn about constituent parts and assemble them based on the prompt, which is not conceptually all that different from how humans do the same thing.
There are obviously moral questions and legal questions around AI art, and I expect that we will see more, but I'm not sure that this statement is accurate.
This is a very strong statement that is not, at least to me, obviously true. I am curious what your argument is - learning from a copyrighted work does not automatically make a work derivative.
These models do not store copies of images they learned from, or attempt to replicate these images. They learn about constituent parts and assemble them based on the prompt, which is not conceptually all that different from how humans do the same thing.
There are obviously moral questions and legal questions around AI art, and I expect that we will see more, but I'm not sure that this statement is accurate.