I'd make the claim (without any real data), that the NHS has _such_ institutional power in the UK that it goes a long way to transcend any SEO shortfall it may have.
It does. Google treats gov.uk and nhs.uk sites as authoritative sources and ranks accordingly. We typically pay no consideration to SEO on non-campaign sites.
It doesn't stop ads from sneaking in above the results though. There's a whole industry of shady companies 'hijacking' and charging extra for free/cheap government services.
* transactional services - those that let a person do a task, like applying for a driving licence or registering a trademark
* information services - a collection of guidance on a subject, like maximum working hours or data protection responsibilities
There are some that don't really fall into either category and are there to advertise something. They aim to be informational and inspirational. Some examples:
The reason SEO is more important on these is that there's often competition. For example, if I search for 'teach in uk' the Get Into Teaching campaign site will be competing with lots of teacher training colleges and companies, job sites, etc.
The NHS definitely does rank highly in the UK. Not sure if it ranks above web md, but they’re usually both in the top 5 results if they have a relevant page.
It pretty much always ranks above WebMD in the UK. WebMD has a very low rank for me. Mayo Clinic is the site that I normally see tussling for the top spot with the NHS. Some examples randomly plucked from my brain:
1. Vitiligo: NHS: 1, Mayo Clinic: 2, WebMD: 7
2. Bronchiolitis: NHS 1, Mayo Clinic 2, WebMD: 9 (on the second page!)
3. Appendicitis: NHS 1, Mayo Clinic 2, WebMD: 3
4. Myopia: Mayo Clinic 1, WebMD 2, NHS: 3
5. Gastroenteritis: NHS Inform (never seen this before?) 1, WebMD: 2, Mayo Clinic 3, NHS: 4
6. Hodgkin's disease: Mayo Clinic 1, NHS: 2, WebMD: 5