Wait, are you saying that an org needs expertise to QC all of the the hardware they procure? How expensive is that? How easy it is to hire that type of QC?
Well, are you saying that an org needs expertise to inspect faulty cars, like, by calling a mechanic?
Is that like too much these days for companies that owb fleets of cars? is opening a server harder than checking whars wrong with a car? like a cable comes loose and that's gane over?
The point, which you seem so dedicated to avoiding, is that "in the cloud" these steps are not my problem. Inspecting a literal shipload of computers for subtle defects is a pain in the ass. Amazon does it for me. When I get on an airplane I do not personally have to run the checklists. The airline does it for me.
> (but then do it right, and not like a amateur who build's his first "gaming-pc").
Again, still avoiding the point, but oddly enough proving the point. You assume everyone isn't an amateur and knows how to build and maintain server hardware. Furthermore, because the market doesn't have enough talent to support all of the companies that exist, consolidating this to a few vendors who do have the expertise is what makes sense (economies of scale) and is what the market already decided.
>Again, still avoiding the point, but oddly enough proving the point.
Please read, that was my comment:
>>Not true the point was you pay for it (cloud), or you do it yourself
>You assume everyone isn't an amateur and knows how to build and maintain server hardware.
Yes that i assume, correct. Otherwise i would not call it "maintaining", is a amateur maintaining your car? Your software? If you have just amateur's handling your hardware it's probably better to pay a cloud-provider or pay a integrator todo that.
Do you see how these costs all start to add up?