The same could be said about other vulnerabilities like mysql injections. The difference in this case is that there was a government proposal that was legitimately passed, but it was unpopular with the community as votes are not 1 per person but rather based off how much you have financially invented into buying voting rights.
In real life this would be the equivalent of buying enough shares of a company to make unpopular changes. Hostile takeovers aren't illegal AFAIK.
If someone had a website that said "My server's code is law. You can do whatever it lets you do." And you found an sql injection vulnerability I would think you'd be allowed to mess with it.
In real life this would be the equivalent of buying enough shares of a company to make unpopular changes. Hostile takeovers aren't illegal AFAIK.