Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's better to believe this because it motivates to practice but it's definitely more nuanced than claiming there is no innate talent.


I am vert certain that,

    talent == nature + nurture
And in my opinion and understanding, talent is at least 51% nurture. But, this is what I think.


Any sources to explore the nuances ?


This one nuances it a little and they provide some references to further explore. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-innate-talent-...

I would also suggest going through the references that they use in Peak and understanding the samples they use to extrapolate from.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: