>Before the bill was presented to Parliament, the UK’s main opposition party, the Labour Party, suggested that it would offer little obstruction to the Online Safety Bill and complained that it hadn’t been introduced fast enough.
Anyone in UK thought about keeping children safe from inheriting a totalitarian dystopia?
UK Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport (DCMS) Secretary of State Nadine Dorries, said her aim with the bill was to "make the internet, in the UK, the safest place in the world for children and vulnerable young people to go online."
People don't realise, but the UK govt think pretty much only about the children and vulnerable young. Legislation begins and end with this question: "how can they make sure everyone is nice and safe?"
Its not that they are using this group as a pretext to shove draconian legislations down our throats, no. /s
The easiest way round this UK authoritarian nonsense would be if Mindgeek et al immediately replaced all media requests to their CDN from UK IPs with a list and photos of the politicians behind the continuous erosion of digital freedoms. The entire country would switch to VPNs so fast, the GCHQ would flip out.
That is true, they will try whatever is needed to keep the UK market as UK eyeballs are worth more than other places.
It’s more like a required gate, like if the UK pushed it, I doubt we would see gates in other jurisdictions. It’s all very chilling effective. I don’t think it’s so much as a gain (why would you even gate it unless regulators were threatening IP and hostname blocks).
You've been to the domain before then. - it sets a value in localStorage to make it a banner at the top instead. First time visitors and Incognito browsers see this on page load: https://kimiwo.aishitei.ru/i/q6P9wN2OBQSDI0n2.png
If "popup_71227_times" is 0 you get the fullscreen popup asking for email with a "Let me read first >" link underneath.
Anyone in UK thought about keeping children safe from inheriting a totalitarian dystopia?