Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

JDBC exists but I honestly think it's a mistake. Higher-level frameworks still end up with a bunch of special cases for handling different lower-level implementations, and meanwhile a lot of functionality gets stuck behind the lowest common denominator interface that JDBC is (e.g. it took forever to get any kind of async support even when both the things above and the things below JDBC were doing great at it).


> e.g. it took forever to get any kind of async support even when both the things above and the things below JDBC were doing great at it

is there even support for async jdbc? I tought they dropped the idea ? (https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdbc-spec-discuss/20...). The reasoning is stupid because async drivers is not only about threading and more about i/o, but w/e.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: