Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You can sue in Pro Per(son) -- essential act as your own lawyer. I know someone who studied the Law so he could sue his former business partners. Most of it was a reverse deep pockets kinda game: "It will cost you $300K in legal fees to defend yourself ... or settle for a fraction of the cost." As a result, I and colleagues ignore this troll. But, there are intriguing implications ...

For example: register the site patent<patent#>.com and use the site to link to the facts. Maybe add the legal definition of "In Pro Person." Thus, when someone does a search on the Patent #, your disclosure site will appear.

Another example: Claim copyright on the expression of the idea. Thus, anyone attempting to express the patent would infringe on the copyright.

Disclaimer: IANAL. I could be off-base here. Get a valid legal opinion to save yourself some grief. And good luck!



No. Absolutely do not act as your own patent lawyer - ever - especially in litigation. It is correctly considered an arcane and difficult field even by other lawyers.


The ability to sue is not the same as suing. Simply the threat of a lawsuit is enough to discourage some transactions. That's the point.

In my case, I used a hybrid approach: I studied the law, drew up a response, and then hired a lawyer at $900/hour (as he was a law professor) to put out a response though his firm. By understanding the basics, I could hypothesize a response, on my own time, and then verify that hypothesis with an expert.

[update]

Actually, I just re-read my above post, and didn't make the point very well. Thanks for pointing that out.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: