A little off topic. Why is it not politically correct to name new pathogens (COVID-19) after country of origin, but's fine to name variants by country of origin?
That seems a bit too pedantic... I think the correct answer is that certain persons tried to use the virus' chinese origin as a smear, and now it's unusable. You can't talk like those people because those people talked like that.
This happens all the time in Germany (where I live now): Nazis use a phrase or something, and after that using it makes one sound like a nazi even if that's really completely unreasonable. There was a fine example around 2002, when the newspaper editors had a long discussion on how to translate the name of dhs.gov without triggering any prejudice in the readers, just because a long-dead nazi tended to use phrases very much like various possible translations.
Noone's been using e.g the South African origin of that variant as a smear, so it doesn't carry any connotations.
It's not a good idea to name diseases after places, because it's misleading and not informative. The WHO has been telling people that "a disease name should consist of generic descriptive terms" for years:
It goes well beyond smears. The WHO notes that it can "provoke a backlash against members of particular religious or ethnic communities, create unjustified barriers to travel, commerce and trade, and trigger needless slaughtering of food animals".
They point out that the scientists need to get ahead of it. Once a name has taken off in the popular press, it's hard to stop.
I'll note that the Department of Homeland Security has a somewhat Orwellian ring in English as well, and that was noted at the time. It sounds like somebody is trying too hard.
I've seen articles saying we should treat the B117 (UK) variant as a new virus. Shouldn't we just call it UK virus if it's a new virus?
I'm not actually serious. I think naming viruses/variants after places is a mistake to begin with since it's hard to prove where they originate. Also it discourages finding new viruses since you don't want your home country's name to be used in naming it.
Nobody knows where the Spanish flu came from. It's just that they were the first ones who paid attention to it since they weren't fighting in WWI.
And even that can be mostly explained by a weak flu season there in 2019, and a generally aging population.
Its difficult to interpret the deaths from this virus as justifying complete lockdown of societies - especially when Sweden has fewer deaths per capita from COVID than a significant number of countries which did order mandatory lockdowns.
I agree with all your points. Being a gringo now for awhile in this country -- this hits the nail on the head in my experience.
Beautiful country though -- it's hard to leave life on the Praia here for something else.
I'm surprised the article doesn't manage to discuss how brazil's leadership messed up big time by insisting in treating this like a flu.
Also, Chile has a ton of vaccines, but they are not the same distribution as, say, the US or the UK: there seem to be a ton of Sinovac, and I'm not sure it's as effective as some other vaccines at stopping by transmission or hospitalizations.
Too don’t hear India whining, but they bought into hydroxychlorine fairly early. Hell, they even supply it to several countries. At least they didn’t turn down medicine because it was highly politicized.
Brazil and Venezuela probably can’t stop you from dying after an infection in the toe. Not sure why they are going to do for anything else.
Brazil has one of the most effective public health systems in the world. Specially considering the country's size. It's not perfect, but it's very, very, far from letting anyone die from an infection in the toe.
